Cerni, T., Di Benedetto, A good., & Rumiati, Roentgen. I. (2021). The newest share of identification and you may intelligence for the cognitive competences in highest studies. Frontiers from inside the Mindset, twelve, 2566.

Damian, R. We., Spengler, Meters., Sutu, An excellent., & Roberts, B. W. (2019). Sixteen taking place sixty-six: A great longitudinal study of personality balances and change all over half a century. Record regarding Character and you will Societal Therapy, 117(3), 674.

Daurio, A beneficial. Meters., & Taylor, J. (2022). A study of your triarchic make of psychopathy and you can worry about-stated People B personality disorder faculties. Personality Disorders: Idea, Search, and Cures, 13(2), 153.

Furnham, A great., & Monsen, J. (2009). Personality traits and you may intelligence assume instructional college or university grades. Discovering and you will personal distinctions, 19(1), 28-33.

Haider, Z. F., & von Stumm, S. (2022). Anticipating academic and you will societal–mental consequences inside emerging adulthood regarding cleverness, identification, and you can socioeconomic reputation. Diary regarding Identity and you may Public Therapy.

Holland, A good. S., & Roisman, Grams. I. (2008). Big Five characteristics and you will relationships top quality: Self-claimed, observational, and you will emotional proof. Log regarding Social and personal Relationship, 25(5), 811-829.

Holley, P., Yabiku, S., & Benin, M. (2006). The connection ranging from cleverness and you can breakup. Record of Loved ones Facts, 27(12), 1723-1748.

Hong-Hua, Y., Wen-Qing, F., & Shu-Qiao, Y. (2006). Symptomatology from Team-B Character Disorders from the Five-Grounds Design Position. Chinese Mental health Journal.

Kassenboehmer, S. C., Leung, F., & Schurer, S. (2018). University studies and non-intellectual ability creativity. Oxford Monetary Documentation, 70(2), 538-562.

Lyngstad, T. H. (2004). The latest impact off parents’ and you will spouses’ education to your divorce cost from inside the Norway. Group lookup, 10, 121-142.

Mathes, Elizabeth. W., Brennan, S. Yards., Haugen, P. M., & Rice, H. B. (1985). Analysis away from bodily attractiveness as the a purpose of ages. The newest Journal of Personal Therapy, 125(2), 157-168.

Spouse really worth can get decline (or perhaps not), although it does maybe not appear to be a boundary to help you matchmaking formation

McGue, Meters., Anderson, E https://kissbrides.com/fr/femmes-panameennes/. L., Willoughby, E., Giannelis, Good., Iacono, W. Grams., & Lee, J. J. (2022). Not because of the grams alone: The great benefits of a college degree one of people with lower levels out-of standard intellectual function. Intelligence, 92, 101642.

Meier, B. P., Robinson, M. D., Carter, Meters. S., & Hinsz, V. B. (2010). Is sociable individuals more beautiful? A no-associate data out-of agreeableness, extraversion, and appeal. Diary regarding Research into the Identity, 44(2), 293-296.

Nieuwenhuis, J. (2018). The newest telecommunications anywhere between university impoverishment and you will agreeableness within the predicting informative attainment. Identity and you may Personal Variations, 127, 85-88.

General characteristics from personality and you can affectivity while the predictors regarding fulfillment into the intimate relationship: Evidence away from mind?and you will companion?ratings

Tatarunaite, Age., Playle, R., Bonnet, K., Shaw, W., & Richmond, S. (2005). Face attractiveness: a great longitudinal study. American Log regarding Orthodontics and you can Dentofacial Orthopedics, 127(6), 676-682.

Sarah Ton, Miriam King, Renae Rodgers, Steven Ruggles, J. Robert Warren and Michael Westberry. Incorporated Personal Have fun with Microdata Show, Newest People Survey: Type ten.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS, 2022.

Scott, S. B., Rhoades, Grams. K., Stanley, S. Yards., Allen, Elizabeth. S., & ). Aspects of separation and memories from premarital input: Ramifications to have improving relationship education. Partners and you can Family Therapy: Browse and exercise, 2(2), 131.

Solomon, B. C., & Jackson, J. J. (2014). So why do personality traits expect separation? Multiple routes as a result of fulfillment. Diary out-of Identity and you may Personal Therapy, 106(6), 978.

Vernon, P. A good., Villani, V. C., Vickers, L. C., & Harris, J. A beneficial. (2008). A behavioural genetic analysis of Dark Triad while the Huge 5. Identity and individual Distinctions, 44(2), 445-452.

Widiger, T. An effective., Sellbom, M., Chmielewski, Yards., Clark, L. An excellent., DeYoung, C. Grams., Kotov, Roentgen., … & Wright, A great. G. (2019). Identification in good hierarchical model of psychopathology. Health-related Psychological Science, 7(1), 77-ninety-five.

The current CPS investigation never inform you in the event the likelihood of separation try ingredient. Relationships you will definitely mean combined marriage ceremonies provides high otherwise all the way down risks than simply the sum total risks of one or two anybody. However, past research on the separation and you may degree demonstrates it’s (Lyngstad, 2004). New separation exposure for two PhD owners is approximately fifteen%, similar to the personal threat of 7-8% to have personal PhD proprietors.

Buss, D. M., Goetz, C., Duntley, J. D., Asao, K., & Conroy-Beam, D. (2017). This new partner modifying hypothesis. Identification and you can Personal Variations, 104, 143-149.